Rasmussen Surname Meaning and Family History

Rasmussen is a patronymic surname meaning son of Rasmus, a Scandinavian form of the personal name Erasmus. Erasmus derives from the Greek ÃŽ µÃ ÃŽ ±ÃÆ'ÃŽ ¼ÃŽ ¹ÃŽ ¿Ãâ€šÃ‚  (erasmios) which means beloved.   Spellings of Rasmussen that end in -sen are most likely Danish or Norwegian in origin, while those that end in -son could be Swedish, Dutch, North German, or Norwegian. Rasmussen is the 9th most popular surname in Denmark  and the 41st most common last name in Norway. Surname Origin:  Danish, Norwegian, North German, Dutch Alternate Surname Spellings: RASMUSEN, RASMUSON, RASMUSSON, RASMUS   Famous People with the Surname RASMUSSEN: Saint Erasmus (Saint Elmo) - 4th-century martyr and patron saint of sailors.Theodore Rasmussen - Canadian neurosurgeon and scientist who gave his name to the rare disease, Rasmussens encephalitis.  Knud Rasmussen - Greenlandic anthropologist and polar explorer; the first European to cross the Northwest Passage via dog sledScott Rasmussen - co-founder of the sports television network ESPNLars and Jens Rasmussen - brothers and creators of Google Maps Where is the RASMUSSEN Surname Most Common? Considering its Scandinavian origins, its not surprising that Rasmussen is most prevalent today in Denmark, where it ranks as the 8th most common surname in the country. Surname distribution data from Forebears also identifies the surnames popularity in Norway, where it ranks 41st, as well as the Faroe Islands (12th) and Greenland (10th). WorldNames PublicProfiler also indicates that Rasmussen is by far most commonly used by people living in Denmark. Norway comes in a distant second. Within Denmark, the surname is found most frequently in Fyn and Stà ¸rstrom, followed by Aarhus, Vestsjà ¦lland, Vejle, Roskilde, Frederiksborg, Kà ¸benhavn, Bornholm and Staden Kà ¸benhavn. Genealogy Resources for the Surname RASMUSSEN Rasmussen Family Crest - Its Not What You Think: Contrary to what you may hear, there is no such thing as a Rasmussen family crest or coat of arms for the Rasmussen surname.  Coats of arms are granted to individuals, not families, and may rightfully be used only by the uninterrupted male-line descendants of the person to whom the coat of arms was originally granted.Rasmussen DNA Project: Rasmussen is a Scandinavian patronymic surname, meaning that your DNA matches will not necessarily (or likely) even be people named Rasmussen. This project will help you determine which Scandinavian and/or haplogroup projects are best to join for research into your Rasmussen heritage.RASMUSSEN Family Genealogy Forum: This free message board is focused on descendants of Rasmussen  ancestors around the world. Search the forum for posts about your Rasmussen ancestors, or join the forum and post your own queries.  FamilySearch - RASMUSSEN  Genealogy: Explore over 1.5  million  results from di gitized  historical records and lineage-linked family trees related to the Rasmussen surname on this free website hosted by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.RASMUSSEN Surname Mailing List: Free mailing list for researchers of the Rasmussen surname and its variations includes subscription details and searchable archives of past messages.GeneaNet - Rasmussen Records: GeneaNet includes archival records, family trees, and other resources for individuals with the Rasmussen surname, with a concentration on records and families from France and other European countries.The Rasmussen Genealogy and Family Tree Page: Browse genealogy records and links to genealogical and historical records for individuals with the Rasmussen surname from the website of Genealogy Today.Ancestry.com: Rasmussen Surname: Explore over 1.4  million digitized records and database entries, including census records, passenger lists, military records, land deeds, probates, wills and other records for t he Rasmussen surname on the subscription-based website, Ancestry.com.

The Necklace And The Kiss By Guy De Maupassant - 1604 Words

In both the â€Å"The Necklace† and â€Å"The Kiss† both written by Guy De Maupassant are classic short stories that embody all literary elements. Like most short stories Maupassant takes the reader on many twists and turns, making the reader assume what is to happen next only to surprise you with what actually happens. In â€Å"The Necklace† social class, lust, and an unfortunate mistake lead a married couple to endure years of hardship. In â€Å"The Kiss† an experienced aunt writes a letter to her heartbroken niece using wisdom and personal accounts to help educate her niece regarding the power of the kiss. The author uses similar techniques and literary elements to teach the readers a lesson, help the story unfold, and give unexpected endings. Like most†¦show more content†¦The imagery in both stories plays a big role in how the stories are played out in the readers mind. In â€Å"The Necklace† the necklace itself is described â€Å"in a black satin case, a superb diamond necklace; her heart began to beat covetously. Her hands trembled as she lifted it. She fastened it round her neck, upon her high dress† (par 41). In the beginning Mathilde is immediately introduced as â€Å"one of those pretty and charming girls† (par 1), but by the end of the story after the ten years of hard work she is described as â€Å"Madame Loisel looked old now. She had become like all the other strong, hard, coarse women of poor households. Her hair was badly done, her skirts were awry, her hands were red.† (par 87). The imagery in this story help the reader visualize the effects of losing the necklace had on Mathilde. Imagery is used similarly in â€Å"The Kiss† the letter written to the young girl is informative with some visual aid. The author of the letter uses dramatic explanation and vivid descriptions to give emphasis to the letter. A kiss and love are brought to life when described â€Å"The slightest shock breaks it, and our power crumbles, and we are never able to raise it again† (par 5). Readers can imagine the emotions they would feel if they were ever to use a kiss wrong. â€Å"no violent delirium of complete possession is worth this trembling approach of the lips, this first moist and fresh contact, and then the long, lingering, motionlessShow MoreRelatedThe Necklace And The Bet Short Story867 Words   |  4 Pages Have you ever read an intense short story? Well both â€Å"The Necklace† and â€Å"The Bet† are the most intense short stories ever. Both authors from both passages explain the dialogue by discovering new aspects of the passages. In â€Å"The Necklace† written by Guy de Maupassant (1884), is about how a character called Mathilde that loses one of her friends necklace, that was a fake, and spends the next 10 years paying it off. On the other hand â€Å"The Bet† written by Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1889) is about aRead MoreRoles of Female Characters in The Necklace and Life in the Country867 Words   |  4 Pagessociety in ‘The Necklace’ and ‘Life in the Country’ There are three things that make up the society; the time, place and people. In each society each of these points differs from other societies. The stories ‘The Necklace’ and ‘Life in the Country’ by Guy de Maupassant were set in a time in which poverty was very common in most places even though each society had a different view as to what poverty is. This essay is examining the roles of the female characters in ‘The Necklace’ and ‘Life in theRead MoreThe Lady With The Dog And Possibly The Jewelry Essay1703 Words   |  7 Pagesstories written within sixteen years of each other; could they really be that different? Could they even be so similar? These short stories were written in two different cultural environments. â€Å"The Jewelry† was written in 1883 by a man named Guy De Maupassant, who based the story in Paris, France. It tells of a man, his wife, and the wife’s two flaws that actually make the man wealthier. â€Å"T he Lady with the Dog† was written by Anton Chekhov, who wrote the story in his hometown Moscow, Russia. This

The Ethical Research of Animal Testing Free Essays

Argumentative Topics The Ethical Research of Animal Testing Name Animal testing has been a hot topic of discussion in society for many years. The debate is whether or not animal testing should be allowed. Some people believe that animal testing is wrong and that it causes undue harm to animals. We will write a custom essay sample on The Ethical Research of Animal Testing or any similar topic only for you Order Now Throughout the last 150 years, the practice of using animals for research has been under intense scrutiny between animal activists and researchers. Scientists insist that the experimental research they do is essential for producing effective drugs, and the animal rights activists believe that testing animals for advancements in medicine is not necessary. I believe that research using animals should continue as long as there is a reason for it to continue. Thanks to animal based research, to date millions of human lives have been saved. Animal testing is the only way to find out if vaccinations work for different diseases. We cannot just ask people off the streets to volunteer, as that would be morally and ethically wrong. At this time, scientific researchers have no alternatives for testing new drugs, as scientific computer modules can only do so much for testing. Also, the government has strong laws in place to ensure the health and welfare of test animals. As long as there is disease and sickness in the world, scientists will always be looking for the next cure and treatment options, so we will always need to have animal research. As long as the animals are treated humanely, I believe that it would be inhumane to the human race to stop animal research. Thanks to animal research, the advancements in disease control have been beneficial and should be able to continue in the future. Although animal research has saved thousands of human lives, it has remained a major controversy for several years even though scientific researchers have tried to ensure the well being of animals. Animal rights activists still deem it inhumane, even though there are strict laws forbidding the inhumane treatment toward animals. Inhumane or not, thanks to the research of animals, scientists have been able to cure many diseases throughout the world, saving millions of human lives. Thanks to the advances of medical technology due to animal research, the research of animals should be able to continue. Stopping animal research would be inhumane to the human race. At this time, scientists have not come up with an alternative to testing drugs on animals. They do have computer simulators, but this technology can only do so much. It is not an advanced enough system to determine if the new medical breakthroughs will work. In the 1960’s, it was discovered that animal research had taken a dark turn, and that scientists were mistreating animals and causing unnecessary harm. Congress later passed a bill called The Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966, which states that it is essential that the welfare of animals being test is the main priority. It is required that animals being tested are to be treated with respect and given the best treatment possible, however; realizing that they are not human. At this time, there are roughly 50 million animals in case studies in the United States, and there are protesting lobbyists that are trying to eliminate animal case studies all together. The problem today is the difference between the medical treatment of humans and the wellbeing of animals. Nowadays, people worry about the welfare of animals until they need the benefits of the medicine that is developed because of animal research. Most people only worry about animals being tested when it is convenient for them. People like to think of themselves as better than that, and animal testing being an unkind and unfavorable act of cruelty. When medical science is needed, it is then that the benefits are welcomed and testing of animals is forgotten. Most people realize that they would rather see an animal be tested on than a child or loved one. Being as it is, if an epidemic did come to be, humans are more likely to side with humans than animals, always putting their own interests above anyone else’s. Thanks to animal research, there has been much medical advancement, such as the discoveries of treatment for polio, emboli, and insulin for diabetes. In the 1950’s, polio ravaged the American public, with its debilitating illness, but thanks to animal research a cure was found. American scientists did extensive research on animals, giving the animals that were tested the polio virus and then curing it. No harm came to the animals involved. Thanks to this research, today there is not a case of polio in the United States. Furthermore, thanks to the scientific study of animals, a treatment for diabetes was discovered by finding a way to get insulin into the cells of humans. These discoveries would not have happened if animal research did not exist, and millions of people would have died as a consequence of it. Researchers continue to find cures for illnesses, and further the advancement of medical technology because of animal testing. People and animals share a similar anatomy so it is easy to see why we share similar diseases, and why treatment should be tested on animals first. By testing animals first, scientists can determine if the new drug is safe for human ingestion. If animal testing were to be banned, how would we be able to find out if new medical technology works? Would we just test on willing participates and see what happens? This would never be accepted by the public or government. No one ever said eating a piece of chicken was wrong even though everyone knows the living conditions chickens endure. They live their whole lives in a little cage in a factory or on a farm until they are all dried up. Then they are killed and served up at McDonalds or Burger King, but there’s no conservancy there. The reason people eat meat is because of the many benefits of meat, with all the nutrients and vitamins to grow healthy and strong. We have used animals in this nature since the beginning of time to eat, keep warm, to build, and to wear. Through all these things we use animals and it is ok. We can go into the forest and shoot and kill animals for sport, but it is wrong to use them for medical purposes. In conclusion, we should show animals the respect they deserve. They have been one of the main sources of human survival since the beginning of time. We need to ensure they are treated with admiration and value. No person should ever treat an animal with disrespect or cruelty, for they are one of the reasons people are on this earth today. Animals are not things for people just to play with and disregard when they are done with them. They are creatures that deserve to be cared for, but not at the expense of the human race. Animals should have the right to thrive, grow, and live a painless life. This should be our tribute to animals for all they do for people. This does not mean that they should have the rights that people have. Regarding animal testing, it is clear that there are two sides of the story, but what side is the right side? This is a personal decision that needs to be seriously considered. The human benefits of animal research discoveries have saved the lives of millions of people, and these treatments would have never been possible without the testing of animals. References Holley, K. (Aug 2009). Animal research practices and doctoral student identity development in a scientific community. In Education Research Complete. Retrieved 26 Sept, 2012, from. http://web. ebscohost. com/ehost/detail. United States Department of Agriculture. Last Retrieved (Sept 21, 2012). United States Department of Agiculture, National Agriculture Library. In undefined, Retrieved Sept 26, 2012, from http: //awic. nal. usda. gov/research-animals. Burnett, C. (March 2009). Should animals continue to be used in research Education Research Complete? In Humane Education Representative, Animals Australia Inc. Retrieved Sept 26, 2012, from. http://web. ebscohost. com/ehost/details. How to cite The Ethical Research of Animal Testing, Essays

Chicken Consumption in the United States free essay sample

The Department of Agriculture is currently looking at the nation’s consumption of chicken. Data have been gathered dating back to 1970, in hopes of finding variables that are closely correlated with chicken consumption so that the consumption can be predicted. In the spreadsheet you will find 36 observations†¦one for each year since 1970. The variables are: Year = Year Y = per capita consumption of chicken (lbs. ) X1 = Real disposable income per capita ($) X2 = Real retail price of chicken per lb (cents) X3 = Real retail price of pork per lb. (cents) X4 = Real retail price of beef per lb. (cents) X5 = Composite real price of chicken substitutes per lb. , which is a weighted average of the real retail prices per lb of pork and beef, the weights being the relative consumption of beef and pork in total beef and pork consumption. I. Create a model using the 5-step methodology I used in class. Examine and discuss the coefficients you obtained in your model, and the overall significance of your model. We will write a custom essay sample on Chicken Consumption in the United States or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Begin with a summary of your findings and then step through your process. The regression model is insignificant. Ha: The regression model is significant. The output below shows significance of regression model using five independent variables. Analysis of Variance Source DF SS MS F P Regression 5 7791. 5 1558. 3 870. 14 0. 000 Residual Error 30 53. 7 1. 8 Total 35 7845. 2 Analysis of variance indicates that, the given regression model is significant F (5, 30) = 870. 14, p lt; . 05. iii. Significance of independent variables. Hypothesis to be tested: H01: The coefficient of real disposable income per capita is insignificant. Ha1: The coefficient of real disposable income per capita is significant. H02: The coefficient of real retail price of chicken per lb is insignificant. Ha2: The coefficient of real retail price of chicken per lb is significant. H03: The coefficient of real retail price of pork per lb is insignificant. Ha3: The coefficient of real retail price of pork per lb is significant. H04: The coefficient of real retail price of beef is insignificant. Ha4: The coefficient of real retail price of beef is significant. H05: The coefficient of composite real price of chicken substitutes per lb is insignificant. Ha5: The coefficient of composite real price of chicken substitutes per lb is significant. The output below shows significance of each of the five independent variables: Predictor Coef SE Coef T P VIF Constant 39. 463 1. 987 19. 86 0. 000 Real Disposable Income per Capi 0. 0020441 0. 0001520 13. 44 0. 000 30. 4 Real Retail Price of Chicken -0. 12907 0. 06014 -2. 15 0. 040 29. 0 Real Retail Price of Pork 0. 4456 0. 1675 2. 66 0. 012 1920. 4 Real Retail Price of Beef 0. 635 0. 2022 2. 79 0. 009 5006. 3 Comp real price of Chicken Subs -1. 0093 0. 3584 -2. 82 0. 009 11822. 0 It indicates that, since p value (. 000) is less than level of significance (0. 05), we reject the hypothesis H01. Hence we conclude that, the coefficient of real disposable income per capita is significant. Since p value (. 040) is less than level of significance (0. 05), we reject the hypothesis H02. Hence we conclude that, the coefficient of real retail price of chicken per lb is significant. Since p value (. 012) is less than level of significance (0. 5), we reject the hypothesis H03. Hence we conclude that, the coefficient of real retail price of pork per lb is significant. Since p value (. 009) is less than level of significance (0. 05), we reject the hypothesis H04. Hence we conclude that, the coefficient of real retail price of beef per lb is significant. Since p value (. 009) is less than level of significance (0. 05), we reject the hypothesis H05. Hence we conclude that, the coefficient of composite real price of chicken substitutes per lb is significant.